Tahlequah Daily Press, Bigfoot in By Eddie Glenn, Wednesday, March 3, 2004 |
||
First of all, let's be
very clear about one thing: This is the Tahlequah Daily Press, not the Weekly
World News. So we're not going to tell you that Osama Bin Laden and Elvis are
both alive and well, and living in the woods of Pumpkin Hollow, just a few
miles outside our fair city of Bigfoot, on the other
hand, might be. Several weeks ago, a
young Tahlequonian who shall remain anonymous for the time being gave a photo
to a Daily Press editorial staff member. He said his mother had
shot the photo in the Pumpkin Hollow area, and that it plainly showed what
could only be identified as Bigfoot him/herself, right smack-dab in the
middle of the picture. After some investigation,
we have to admit that the aberration in the photograph - while not clearly
identifiable as Bigfoot - isn't really identifiable as anything besides
Bigfoot either. Of course, it could be a
scratch on the lens of a camera, or a speck of dust on the film
, or any number of other technical explanations. But we can't
completely rule out the possibility that it just might, maybe - within the
realm of all possibilities - really be a hairy, upright-walking creature that
is commonly known as "Bigfoot." If it isn't Bigfoot in
the picture, what the heck - no harm done. But if it is Bigfoot, or
a variant thereof, it wouldn't be the first one sighted in these parts. According to the "We kind of shook
our heads when we got the call, but the lady sounded serious," Jack
Goss, then an investigator with the CCSO, is reported as saying. "She
said Bigfoot was in her back yard. We thought she might have seen a bear, but
she was really sure that it wasn't. She said it was hairy and stank really
bad." The story also cites
then-and-now Cherokee County Undersheriff Dan Garber, who said several
residents in the area had reported similar sightings,
and that several calves and sheep had been reported missing in the area. "I've known other
areas to get calls like this, but this is the first time we've heard anything
like this in On Monday this week,
Garber said he remembered that incident fairly well. "It caused quite a
commotion for about a week," he said. "The people from the national
Bigfoot organization called up and said, 'If you hear of any other sightings,
let us know.'" The national organization
to which Garber referred is the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization, and
according to their Web site, the 1990 Eldon incident is a "Class A"
sighting. According to that Web site: "Class A reports involve clear sightings,
in circumstances where misinterpretation or misidentification of other
animals can be ruled out with greater confidence. There are few footprint
cases that are very well-documented. Those are considered Class A reports as
well, because misidentification of common animals can be confidently ruled
out, thus the potential for misinterpretation is very low." The Web site also states
that Cherokee County Sheriff's Deputy Joe Weavel investigated the sighting,
and found foot impressions big enough to place both his feet in. It also
states that two days after the initial report, an 8-year-old girl and her
mother described a similar creature rummaging through a trash pile near their
house. "Their dog chased it
but returned with its tail between its legs. The creature was described as 8
feet tall with dark brown frizzy hair and similar to a bear, except that it
was described as walking upright," states the BFRO report. Since 1990, there haven't
been any other sightings - until now. Of course, if Bigfoot
really does live in the woods of That someone would be
Oklahoma Game Warden Brady May. May, however, has never
seen Bigfoot. But he has seen a couple of bears. In fact, May said 1990
was during a several -year-long period in which bear sightings were common in
"It's not uncommon
for our department to go to an area where there's a nuisance bear complaint,
trap it, and release it," said May. "It wouldn't be uncommon for
someone to see one around here." Still, the 1990 Eldon
Bigfoot sighting is (at least in Bigfoot parlance) a "Class A"
event, and according to the BFRO Web site, " Several reports near this
area [have been made] since the early '70s, also possible reports near According to Garber,
regardless of whether Bigfoot is a "One thing that
always seems to be consistent in these sightings," he said, "is
they always seem to be in wooded areas where an animal could move around
undetected. You don't get many sightings in |
||
|